|
IIt was the ancient Egyptians who started making naturalistic life-size,
if static, representations of the human body, and the Greeks who endowed
the figures with movement in both sculpture and painting. The Hellenic
ideal of beauty was adopted by the Romans and revitalised through the
Renaissance, and it has remained the aspiration of artists on canvas or
in the round down to our own day. But the prehistoric Celts on the Continent
were disinterested in naturalism, and played around so much with the human
formparticularly the facethat the essential elements of eyes,
nose and mouth were sometimes only barely recognisable in their novel
artistic configurations. This was a freedom of design which broke away
from the constraints of classical formulae and allowed the craftsman to
develop his own ideas in an untrammelled fashion, and enabled him also
to infuse his images with new force and meaning.
Yet this stylisation of the human face and figure is something that was
practised by the prehistoric Irish long before the Celts ever came to
our shores (whenever that may have been). The superbly elegant curves
and spirals on the five-thousand-year old Knowth macehead (Fig 1) provide
us with all the suitably-reduced components so that we can recognise in
it a human face which is far removed from the realism of a Greek vase-painter
or the product of Michelangelos mallet and chisel. Carved from intractable
flint, it is part of a mysterious fantasy world, more ritual than real,
and a chef doeuvre of the European Stone Age which abounds with
strength through astounding craftsmanship.
Three thousand years later, Celtic La Tène metalworkers in Ireland
used analogous curvilinear elements in different, yet equally masterly,
waysand probably also in the service of ritualto induce us
to see eyes and mouth behind a graceful series of spirals raised in relief
above the surface of a circular bronze dish like that from Monasterevan,
Co. Kildare, now in the National Museum (Fig 3).
 Stylisation
can equally be observed in the great manuscript Books of Durrow and Kells
in the Library of Trinity College, Dublin, but it is the 9th-century high
crosses in stone which confront us for the first time in Ireland with
the differences between the stylised and the naturalistic representations
of the human form, best exemplified in the juxtaposition of crosses from
Moone, Co. Kildare, and Monasterboice, Co. Louth. Moone cannot but bring
a smile to our faces with the naïve static simplicity and graphic
charm of its twelve apostles, executed by a master of flat relief in a
timeless tradition (Fig 6). Monasterboice, in contrast, has figures in
high, rounded, relief, demanding our respect through the statuesque figures
of realistic (if occasionally squat) proportions which would give visiting
Martians a better idea of what we humans on planet earth actually look
like (Fig 7).
The sudden appearance of this naturalistic carving with fleshy figures
in rounded relief suggests that Ireland did indeed have visitors, but
most likely from the European mainland of Charlemagne and his sons, who
found inspiration in the sculptural heritage from the Roman world of Classical
antiquity in creating a Carolingian Renaissance in the arts.
This phase of naturalism inIrish stone-carving did not long out-last the
Carolingian Empire and, in remarkable bronzework such as the St Johns
crucifixion plaque and the Soiscél Molaise shrine (both in the
National Museum), the country can be seen to have continued the native
tradition of stylisation from the first into the second millennium. The
latter brought with it a new brand of stylisation in the form of Romanesque,
whose arcane yet wonderful artistic language the Irish embraced and made
their own, as we can see from 12th-century church portals and chancel
arches in the country. At Kilteel, Co. Kildare, we find typically-Irish
capitals bearing reasonably naturalistic human faces, but with hair plaited
back into a complicated interlace which is as difficult to unravel as
the meaning behind many Romanesque carvings (Fig 2).
In
the later Middle Ages, the International Gothic style permeated Ireland,
and re-introduced the more naturalistic figure style that we know particularly
from tomb-sculpture originally of Norman inspiration, but which ultimately
went beyond the bounds of the Pale where their rule held sway. But, even
then, stylisation of a kind could creep in as on a 16th-century crucifixion
from Fertagh in north Kilkenny that is now preserved in the grounds of
Johnstown Catholic church adjoining the Dublin-Cork road. The varying
lengths of the sinewy legs, and more particularly, the stylised arm muscles
of the Christ figure make it look forward to the sculpture of the 20th
century (Fig 4). Its subject, if not quality, was imitated in many a western
Irish crucifixion plaque of the 1620s and 1630s, such as that in the north
transept of the cathedral at Kilmacduagh, Co. Galway (Fig 5). The descent
into a folk art of varying quality can be seen in the course of the following
two centuries in the penal crucifixes (probably produced as souvenirs
for pilgrims visiting St Patricks Purgatory in Donegals Lough
Derg), which have an appealing simplicity that contrasts so strikingly
with all the fine paintings and statues which bring us back to the noble
figures of ultimately classical derivation that dominate the artistic
scene in Ireland throughout the 18th and 19th centuries.
With the Celtic revival in the decades on either side of 1900, we suddenly
experience an intentional resurgence of the stylisation of a millennium
earlier. This was not simply a reaction to the sentimental naturalism
that pervaded the Victorian period, but a purposeful and political manifestation
of true nationalistic feeling in the country which is well expressed in
the beautiful 1926 metalwork and enamel tabernacle by Mia Cranwill in
St Michaels Church in Ballinasloe, Co. Galway. This fine piece of
craftsmanship is a cleverly-worked descendant of the early Irish medieval
metalwork shrines of a thousand years earlier, yet giving a new twist
to the figures of Christ and his Apostles, and providing novel ways of
applying enamel to the decoration in an ingenious composition that deliberately
evokes memories of the great days of Celtic Ireland.
Inspiration of a very different kind which led to stylisationalmost
to the point of abstractionwas the Cubist movement as seen in the
work of Mainie Jellett, where Parisian style was adapted to Italian composition
in an Irish context in her Virgin of Eire in the National Gallery. There,
we can just make out the Virgin and Child flanked on each side by a single
figure in symphonic movements of curving colour blended into a very pleasing
whole. Throughout his life, Louis le Brocquy, too, has been weaving his
magic in avoiding the naturalistic when producing his wraith-like figures
in various colours. The same can probably also be said of the heads he
has painted of well-known personalities, living and dead, where we can
peer through the brush-stokes to identify the faces of those whom we can
recognise from well-known photos and from more naturalistic representations.
Even
if I have to depart from my chosen theme of the human figure and face,
I cannot conclude this brief essay without mentioning one master in the
stylisation of animals, and that is Conor Fallon, whose metalwork birds
encapsulate the best of Irish stylisation (Fig 8). They are among the
most recent and welcome expressions of a tendency towards the stylised
in Irish art and craft that goes back to the passage graves of the Boyne
Valley and elsewhere. During this span of five thousand years, we can
see how stylisation comes and goes, dominant at some periods, yet fighting
for attention at others against the pervasive influence of the classical
ideal of the human figure. Yet it is always an ever-present fire which
flickers or flames through Irish art, making us see things differently,
and training the eye to look beyond the classical and the naturalistic
to a magic world of fantasy which never fails to excite and delight.
Peter Harbison is an archaeologist and author of
Irelands Treasures, 5000 Years of Artistic Expression 2004 Hugh
Lauter Levin Associates.
|