 |
Dublin the Buildings of Ireland
Christine Casey
Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 2005
pp 756 ills 120 col with sketch drawings & plans h/b €48.00/£29.95
ISBN 0-300-10923-7
Peter Pearson
A
detailed, comprehensive and incisively written gazetteer. These are
the words from the fly-leaf of Christine Caseys new book on Dublin
citys buildings and architecture, a bible-thick, 750-page volume designed
to be used as a guide; the latest in The Buildings of Ireland series, published
by Yale, which aims to cover the whole country, when eventually completed.
The books follow a format laid down by Nikolaus Pevsner and Alistair Rowan
and are companions to a similar series on the buildings of England, Scotland
and Wales. Dublin is the third Irish volume, following those on north-west
Ulster and north Leinster.
Publishers are fond of making lavish claims on the covers of their books,
but in this case words like uniquely comprehensive are no exaggeration.
Each page is densely packed with relevant information, where the authors
tight but elegant writing style serves this type of book very well. The
book is indeed comprehensive and everything now standing in Dublin is included
from the expected great public buildings to the modest artisan dwellings
(demolished buildings, unless they are of great significance like say Nelsons
Pillar, are not dealt with). The stunning, the mediocre, the dreary and
even the ugly are there, and the author usually lets us know what she feels
about them. Though most of the text is concerned with historical fact, dates
and descriptions, there is quite a lot of aesthetic analysis and personal
judgement made about the merits or otherwise of buildings and their design,
alterations or even restoration. This discussion adds interest to the book,
especially because many of the buildings have been written about before,
in some shape or form. For instance, we are left in no doubt that the author
is unimpressed by the Spire in OConnell Street with its clearly
visible joints and nasty mirror-patterned base! The 20th century is
well represented in the book and Christine Casey is even-handed in her assessment
of it achievements.
The 19th century is also strongly represented and much new information about
architects, builders and occupants is provided. Here too, the depth of detail
is astounding; both in the historical research and the description of the
buildings. There are also frequent references to similar contemporary structures
in England or elsewhere which help to provide a broader context for the
architecture.
Mountjoy Prison for instance, is analysed with reference to other Victorian
radial plan prisons. While we are reminded, with some irony
perhaps that the interior is inaccessable, we could also have
been told that the future of this impressive building is in some doubt,
as there are plans to move the prison elsewhere; but that would be to stray
into territory which such a book avoids. Indeed there is so much descriptive
detail of the finer buildings in Dublin that there would hardly be enough
space for chapter and verse on how close so many of them came to being demolished
and swept away altogether. Personally, I would like to have heard more about
the unending campaigns in which voluntary groups persisted for the last
forty years, to prevent the destruction of so much of Dublin city, as some
younger readers might just think that all of this wonderful architectural
heritage just survived all by itself. However, the politics of conservation
is not the subject of this book, but as in the form of an inventory, it
is a guide or gazetteer to what may be seen now, street by street, area
by area. In this task it succeeds superlatively.
The organisation of the book follows a logical sequence, with an introduction,
leading on to the description of churches, then public buildings and finally
the streets. The streets are arranged in alphabetical order. Once familiar
with this system, the book is easy to use, with one or two exceptions: the
bibliography, or further reading, is buried on page eighty at
the end of a very detailed, incisive and comprehensive eighty-page introduction!
Also, I had difficulty finding the text about the Halfpenny Bridge (not
listed in the index), but eventually discovered that there is an excellent
section devoted to the Liffey Bridges at the back of the book! But these
are minor points.
Dublin is far more than a very large pocket guide; it is the ultimate reference
book on the citys built heritage, as it stands in 2005. It is essentially
an academic work of great scholarship, and sometimes one regrets that such
well presented, concise work had to be squeezed into such a narrow volume.
However, it is the quality of these small, fat volumes which is the hallmark
of the Pevsner series. The occasional black and white illustrations and
plans of important buildings are well reproduced and very useful, as are
the maps. The colour photographs by David Davison provide a rich mirror
to the text, and are collected together in the middle of the book. The photographs
in particular caught my eye, both illustrating interiors which I had not
seen before; one is the elegant painted interior of the drawing room in
No 73 Lower Baggot Street, and the other, a delightful gothic, plaster decorated
wall in the chapel at Warrenmount Convent, Blackpitts.
There is also much information which is new. For instance, it is generally
assumed that No 42 Upper OConnell Street is the only surviving 18th-century
house on the street; and I was fascinated to learn that the Royal Bank building
(No 63-64) contains an 18th-century staircase and other original features.
The frequent notes and references to sculpture, decorative features, stained
glass and ironwork are also very rewarding. Throughout the book the sustained
level of historical research and observation is outstanding. In her acknowledgements,
Christine Casey pays tribute to the many people who contributed or assisted
in one way or another, but reveals that she, as a working mother, has spent
ten years putting this book together. A small book it may seem, but it is
a monumental work which celebrates our Capital city.
Peter Pearson is an artist and an architectural historian.
Cescas Diary 1913-1916 Where Art and Nationalism Meet
Hilary Pyle
Woodfield Press, Dublin, 2005
pp 450 ills 16 pp full colour, oil & pastels,
70 pp b/w plates p/b
€45.00 ISBN 0-9534293-7-7
Brian Trench
Cescas
Diary contains a scene from 1914 in which the diarist describes a visit
to the family home in Dublin by her cousin Wilbraham Trench and his adorable
children. A friend of Cescas, Diarmuid Coffey, is invited to
the house to help entertain the children. One of those children, Síghle,
especially enjoys his earthquake game. Another of the children, then aged
four, was Chalmers Trench, later to become my father. His sister, my aunt
Sheela, as she spelled it, was later to marry Diarmuid Coffey. In the meantime,
and tragically briefly, Diarmuid had been married to Cesca. These connections
give this book a greater-than-usual interest for me. But the life and experience
of Cesca (also Francesca, Frances, Proinséas) Trench, otherwise Sadhbh
Trínseach, were unknown to me.
The book is based largely on a series of notebooks of contemporaneously-recorded
impressions and reflections, written in English, Irish and French. From
Hilary Pyles selection, it appears that they tell far less about the
mind of an artist than they do about the world of a nationalist activist
of ascendancy background. The diaries record her frequent sketching, and
her many assignments as illustrator and designer, but the relatively modest
catalogue of works in this volume comprises mainly works that find their
significance only in the political moment, and others whose whereabouts
are unknown.
Cescas known works include portrait drawings of Douglas Hyde, Eoin
MacNeill and Treaty signatory, Robert Barton and of others associated with
the national movement in the 1910s. Her diaries are peopled by these and
many scores of others similarly involved in Conradh na Gaeilge, Cumann na
mBan, Cumann Gaelach na hEaglaise, Irish Volunteers, and other such organisations
into whose activities Cesca threw herself during her Dublin years, from
1913 to 1918. She clearly made a big impression. Miss Trench
seems to have had a charismatic presence, and she was aware that others
have pleasure for their eyes in me. Hyde appears to have especially
enjoyed her company, and was a frequent visitor to the Trench home, and
she to Hydes. Hyde was one of the senior Gaelic Protestants,
who formed the main nexus in which Cesca operated. The contradictions and
tensions of that world are amply demonstrated in this diary. Contained within
the same families were landlords and social reformers, British Army officers
and Irish Volunteers, Conservative MPs, Irish Unionists and Nationalists.
In between designing posters and murals and attending meetings in the nationalist
cause, Cesca would visit cousins of unionist persuasion. But she gives no
account of how their political differences were played out, if, indeed,
they were.
By contrast, she describes in detail many conversations and arguments with
Diarmuid Coffey. He was the son of a National Museum keeper, an aspiring
barrister, and deeply involved in the national movement. Their families
knew each other, and Cesca often stayed with the Coffeys. She found Diarmuid
stimulating company, but also too conciliatory towards the English, and
too moderate in his stance. From fairly early in their friendship, however,
marriage was a possibility. Pyles chosen excerpts from her diaries
include passages in which she is seen to overcome her reservations, and
put aside the contending claims on her affection of Claud Chevasse. Diarmuids
role in the running of guns on the Asgard into Howth in 1914 clearly helped
his case with Cesca. The diary includes vivid description of the picnic-like
atmosphere in Howth as the guns were awaited, in the apparently benign presence
of the Dublin Metropolitan Police.
One of the ways in which Cesca expressed her friendship was to draw portraits
of people, as she did several times of Diarmuid. When they did eventually
marry, in 1918, Diarmuids close friend, Robert Barton, was best man.
He had enlisted with the British army in 1914, resigned in protest at the
suppression of the Easter Rising, and was elected a Sinn Féin MP
in 1918. Incongruously, he wore his military uniform to the wedding of these
two strong nationalists.
Cescas brother, Reggie she calls him Raghnaill also
served in the British army. He was in Dublin in Easter 1916 to suppress
the rebellion, while his sister went to talk to the rebels in the GPO. Her
diary records his visit to them just days after the rising but she is silent
on his role, and it is full of love for her brother and for the other members
of her immediate family. In March 1918, she was writing him a long letter,
with news of her wedding plans, when news came that he had been killed in
France. Just over six months later, the Spanish flu hit Dublin,
as it had hit other parts of Europe, and claimed Cesca as a victim. Hilary
Pyles painstaking work has recovered the many fascinating traces of
her short, intense adult life.
Brian Trench is Head of the School of Communications, Dublin City University.
The Diaries of Lord Limericks Grand Tour 1716 to 1723
The Earl of Roden (ed)
Reprinted from the County Louth Archaeological and Historical Journal,
xxv No 3, 2003
Printed by Dundalgan Press, Dundalk, for Doonreaghan Press, Cashel, 2005
pp 65 ills 1 col & 7 b/w p/b
€12.50/£8.50 ISBN 0-9539033-1-1
Tollymore the Story of an Irish Demesne
The Earl of Roden
Ulster Architectural Heritage Society, 2005
pp 108 ills 45 col & 63 b/w h/b & p/b
€29.95 h/b ISBN 0900457643 €22.50 p/b ISBN 0900457651
Philip McEvansoneya

The term Grand Tour usually conjures up images of English-speaking
milordi combining culture and pleasure on an extended and leisurely journey
through the heart of Europe to Italy. The Tour was usually undertaken by
young men to educate them in foreign manners and morals and to study in
Rome three great phases of European art: Classical Antiquity, the High Renaissance
and the Baroque. James Hamilton (c.1691-1758), created Viscount Limerick
in 1719, was no exception to this he was certainly in Padua in 1716
but any diaries he may have made on that trip are not known to survive.
However, accounts of two other tours do survive: the first details a trip
down the Loire valley in May-June 1716; the second relates to a longer tour
through the Low Countries, France, Spain, Portugal, back to Spain and then
France, with an escort of four horses for his personal security, undertaken
between July 1722 and April 1723. France and Italy received many visitors
following the Peace of Utrecht in 1713, whereas Spain and Portugal were
much less common destinations. Limerick was somewhat adventurous in crossing
the Pyrenees to the Iberian peninsula where the roads were poor and the
brigands notorious, making travel difficult, slow and dangerous. Lord Roden
suggests, with some understatement, that the peninsula appealed to the more
determined and experienced traveller.
Limericks diaries are absorbing precisely because they are miscellaneous
and anecdotal. He recorded a wide range of things as they caught his interest.
In Spain, for example, he was interested in the high and the low, alternating
between the study of Roman antiquities and attendance at a bull-fight, the
latter being a completely new experience for him. There are recurrent emphases
on historical events, military observations and prices and incomes. Limerick
gives lists of people he encountered en route, including the writer Voltaire,
and he briefly notes the Irish colleges at Alcalá and Belem. Although
Limerick mentions a number of works of architecture and comments on some
such as the cathedrals of Seville and Toledo, he did not see or note much
in the way of painting or sculpture, which is disappointing. His imagination
seems to have been more taken by the nuns of Oclivellas - most of
them have lovers and other such picaresque details.
Lord Rodens introduction sets out some interesting general context
for the tours. In the absence of evidence he does not speculate as to why
Limerick undertook his unusual trip to Spain and Portugal except to suggest,
in the words of the minister to Lisbon, James OHara (Lord Tyrawley),
that it was because those countries excite ones curiosity more
than any other countries by being least known.
Tollymore demesne, near Newcastle, Co Down, the ancestral home of the Magennis
family, which Lord Limerick began to upgrade in the 1720s, is now one of
the most popular attractions in Ireland, receiving more than 200,000 visitors
annually. Although the house was demolished in 1952 a number of important
and intriguing estate buildings survive, enhancing the highly picturesque
landscape setting adjacent to the Mountains of Mourne. Amongst them are
bridges, gateways and follies including the so-called Clanbrassill Barn,
designed in the style of Thomas Wright of Durham in imitation of a small-scale,
country Gothic church complete with short octagonal tower and spire.
As well as a location for witty buildings, the demesne has been an important
centre of arboriculture. Limerick and his son, the second Earl of Clanbrassill,
were great improvers, importing new species from Holland and America and
thus founding the arboretum which continues to be important today. This
had both landscaping and commercial motives: the oaks planted by the second
Lord Clanbrassill were felled 150 years later to build the grand staircase
of the Titanic.
Lord Roden, whose family inherited the demesne in 1798 and whose grandfather
was its last private owner, gives an engaging, chronological account of
the development of Tollymore, culminating in the 1950s when it opened to
the public as a forest park. It is detailed, being closely documented from
estate and family papers, yet highly readable and benefits from numerous,
evocative illustrations.
Philip McEvansoneya is Head of History of Art at Trinity College Dublin.
Connemara & Beyond
Walter Pfeiffer
Walter Pfeiffer Studios, Dublin, 2005
pp 120 fully illustrated h/b
€39.00 ISBN 0954809610
Wicklow A Personal View
Walter Pfeiffer
Walter Pfeiffer Studios, Dublin, 2005
pp 144 fully illustrated h/b
€39.00 ISBN 0954809602
Limited editions (400 copies) also available from walterpfeiffer@eircom.net
€70.00
Mark Granier
 Having
recently been to Inis Mór and the Burren, working on a photographic
project of my own, I received Walter Pfeiffers Connemara and Beyond
with a good deal of interest. It is impressive to behold, a big, landscape-format
production for a generous coffee table.
Pfeiffer states that his Connemara is a place I have photographed
over and over again and yet found ever-new and freshly revealed. However,
with such photogenic (and over-photographed) territory, it is very difficult
to find a fresh perspective. There are some nice close-ups, of streams,
boats and lichened stones, a horses brown-freckled face, an oysters
shell like a heap of old broken slates. There is also a remarkable, very
painterly view of Ben Burry draped in a grey-white cloud: a foreground that
appears to have been carpeted in orange felt, and in the dark lap of the
mountain a pale, distant thread of a waterfall stitching everything together.
Pfeiffers introduction includes perceptive quotes from Tim Robinson,
about the impossibility of pinpointing Connemaras boundaries, and
John Moriarty, about the shifting sense of scale. There are also black and
white photographs of the Aran Islands, presumably from Pfeiffers first
solo exhibition in the 1970s. Id have been interested to see more
of these. Working only with shades of grey, there is less danger of ones
vision being absorbed by the kind of panoramic gorgeousness that can rarely
be done justice to by anything other than painting.
Perhaps as an acknowledgment that Connemara is part of the Gaeltacht, the
titles of the photographs are bilingual and I counted three untranslated
poems by Nuala Ní Dhomhnaill. There are also four poems by Moya Cannon,
the most effective of which, for me, are the shorter, archeo-lyrical delvings:
I lie down in a stone bowl/in the sun-warmed streambed, /my head beside
the flow, /and let the blethering of mountain water/erode me. Pfeiffer ends
his introduction by expressing the hope that the power of their poems,
scattered amongst my photographs, will whisper secrets to you as seductively
as the hills and bogs of this place have whispered to me. Certainly,
some of the photographs might induce the odd swoon. For those who enjoy
such images (especially those who have never been to Connemara), the book
will make a handsome Christmas present.
Wicklow A Personal View was published in 2004. The size and format
are the same as Pfeiffers book on Connemara, and the dominant mood,
as with Connemara & Beyond, is romantic. In this instance there is just
one poem, the elegiac Luggala, by John Montague, nicely complimented by
a brooding, misty photograph of the steep, formidable Fancy.
Garech a Brúns entertaining introduction gives a condensed,
personalised history of the region. The cast includes almost everyone from
St Mantáin to Samuel Beckett, with cameos by Frederick May, Peter
La Touche, Lord Powerscourt, The United Irishmen, Angelica Hueston, Seamus
Heaney, Marianne Faithfull and Robert Kee (to name just a few).
As a Brún says, the beautiful landscape, as shown in this book,
has changed little since [the 16th century]. So there is an abundance
of lushness and lakes: Glendalough, Luggala, Powerscourt, Lough Dan, Lough
Tay, Glenmalure etc, whilst Wicklow, Bray and Blessington, for example,
do not make an appearance. Despite great swaths of urbanisation in the county,
people and their trappings (apart from a handful of suitably picturesque
residences such as Russborough House and Castle Howard) have been almost
entirely excluded. Pfeiffers personal view of Wicklow is rich in luminously
beautiful landscapes. Its perfect if youre seeking locations
to shoot another Excalibur or wish to take a pictorial gallop through The
Garden of Ireland. Without so much as a gardener in evidence though,
it seems a mite lonely.
Mark Granier is a Dublin-based poet and photographer.
Sean Scully: Body of Light
Brian Kennedy et al
The National Gallery of Australia, 2004
pp 216 ills b/w throughout h/b with tipped on colour plate to front board
£27.00/€40.00 ISBN 0642541736
Catherine Marshall
Reviewers
usually get more mileage out of material that they do not enjoy; it is easier
to find incisive epithets for the negative than the positive and to woo
an audience with a witty put-down, than to find precise accolades for the
things that we like. In the case of the National Gallery of Australias
2004 publication Sean Scully: Body of Light there is no room for negativity.
The book is simply a delight, from its foursquare red cover complete with
an artwork for a window, through a beautifully balanced range
of texts and a visual essay, to the colour plates of the catalogue, it never
falters, while all the time proclaiming a physicality that is a hallmark
of Scullys painting.
Scully has been painting now for forty years. For most of that time he has
painted stripes and squares of colour, so what makes another book that looks
back over that minimalist career so exciting? One after the other the essays,
starting with Brian Kennedys overview of the artists life and
career in abstraction to the final essay by Shaune Larkin in which one particular
painting is discussed at some length, the writing is lucid, intelligent
and refreshingly free of verbiage. From an Irish point of view, it is worth
noting that the painting at the centre of Larkins essay is probably
one of the best the artist has ever painted and it was purchased for the
National Gallery of Australia in honour of its Irish Director, Brian Kennedy.
The essays are short but weighty. Arthur Dantos brief discussion of
the place of painting now and Scullys contribution to that place is
informed, direct and thought-provoking, tracing the debate about painting
as an art form from the Renaissance through the Marxist and Feminist cultural
revolutions of the 1970s to the challenges of the new technologies and new
social mores we live with now. His claim for Scully, that he has reclaimed
painting from the doldrums by combining a universal, minimal language of
form with a layering of paint that allows ambiguity, uncertainty and richness
to seep up through the gaps a kind of paradigm of the unconscious
and the ego along with an unerring sense of the work as object, though
never sculpture, is a welcome contribution to the wider debates about painting
and is well sustained and totally convincing. Donald Kuspit, not surprisingly,
looks at the expressionist aspects of Scullys work with his usual
intelligence and passion, while the classical and the romantic dichotomies
that all great art contains and develops are discussed in relation to Scully
by Timo Vuoriskowski.
Another of the special attractions of this book is the inclusion of a visual
essay on the making of a single painting, a sequence of photographs by Lilane
Tomasko, showing the various metamorphoses that a Scully painting undergoes
before it does the job the artist wants it to do. This is really useful
art-historical documentation, understated but powerful, taking us through
the artists thought processes and revealing the depth charges that
lie explosively beneath the breathing surface of the finished work. Add
to this the carefully selected comments by the artist that accompany each
colour plate in the catalogue and you know this is a book you want to keep
near you forever. At last an art book that is beautiful to look at, informative
and intelligent and does not need a coffee table to sustain it.
Catherine Marshall is Senior Curator for the Irish Museum of Modern Art.
Space Architecture for Art
Gemma Tipton (ed)
Circa, Dublin, 2005
pp 272 ills full colour p/b
€25.00 ISBN 0955031907
Arthur Gibney
Space
Architecture for Art is an eclectic series of structured essays on
contemporary art spaces in Ireland and abroad which examines inferred relationships
between the primacy of architectural space with exhibited art, and defines
interventions which mutate or mediate these relationships. It is edited
by Gemma Tipton, with a preface by Brian ODoherty, entitled White
Box/Black Cube, which immediately introduces a polemical base for
the debate that follows in several other contributory essays. Gemma Tipton
also plays an important introductory role in essays which cover the historical
development of the gallery archetype, from K F Schinkels Altes Museum
of the 1820s to Yoshio Taniguchis 2004 MOMA, and an exploratory analysis
of the interaction between space and the contained object. These are enlivened
by personal quotations from as diverse a group of artists, architects and
critics as Claes Oldenburg, Barret Newman, Peter Eisenman, Philip Johnston,
Donald Judd, Steven Holl and Frank Gehry. These quotations provide a lucid
insight into the complex and controversial issues which confront the designer,
the exhibiter and the curator of todays museums.
The discussion of course, is highly focused on several of the worlds
latest and most famous art venues, such as the Guggenheim in Bilbao, the
Tate Turbine Hall, in London and the new MOMA in New York, but the infelicities
of Lloyd Wrights old 1950s Guggenheim in Manhattan are evidently still
not forgotten, and the master may never be forgiven, by some of the painting
fraternity. Richard Meier, probably the most prolific museum designer of
the last decades of the 20th century, also comes in for some unexpected
stick for deficiencies in his Barcelona MACBA and for a failure to meet
the full expectations of the Getty Foundation trustees in Los Angeles.
The debate between the polar ideals of spatial neutrality and the spatial
dominance of architectural creativity is well articulated by many diverse
voices. Yoshio Taniguchi, the advocate of the minimalist white box, in an
explanation of his MOMA extension describes
the primary objective
in the design of a museum is to create the ideal environment for the interaction
of people and art. Steven Holl talks of MOMA as a room of the
muse, a place to think and consider deeply and at length. Frank Gehry
on the other hand, justifies his powerfully expressive architectural forms
and his spatial complexity in Bilbao, as the persuasive influence of the
contemporary arts community. In a fascinating dialogue with Michael Asher
and a group of fellow artists in 1970, he claims he was persuaded to forget
neutrality in favour of an architectural impact which focused attention
on both the art and its architectural container.
This book is particularly relevant in Ireland today, emerging as it does,
in a period when a new generation of museums and art centres is being commissioned
in many cities and provincial centres. International theory and debate on
the ideal exhibition space is extended and complimented by a series of exploratory
essays on local developments and interviews with architects and directors
of Irish art centres.
ODonnell and Tuomeys recently completed Lewis Glucksman Gallery
on the campus of University College Cork is the subject of two separate
contributions. Peter Murray describes the building, its setting and the
design process of its procurement from the directors/users viewpoint.
In an interview with Fiona Kearney, John Tuomey talks about the architectural
concept and the influences that initiated and shaped the design development.
The large corpus of contributions to art centres in Northern Ireland reflects
the considerable Arts Council/Lottery funding programme of the last decade.
Damien Coyles essay, Art Houses of the Pentapolis describes
the results of infrastructural expansion in Armagh, Lisburn, Derry, Newry
and Belfast. Marianne OKane reports on the urban regeneration of Belfasts
Cathedral Quarter and the ambitious arts and cultural initiative of the
Laganside precinct. James Kerr, in an interview with Gemma Tipton, describes
the interactive tensions between curator and architect in the making of
the Millennium Court Arts Centre in Portadown. The cultural and political
importance of the conversion of the former 10,000 ft market building into
the Millennium Centre is explored in another essay by Ciarán Mackel.
One of the most relevant contributions to the scope of this book is the
discussion on gallery circulation and visitor experience in an interview
with Barbara Dawson of the Dublin City Gallery and the architect Desmond
McMahon. Anyone who has spent an exhausting Sunday in Manhattans Metropolitan
Museum of Art (or any equally confusing venue) will appreciate this commentary.
There is much to be gleaned also in terms of visitor reaction in the Vox
Pop Section of the book which presents a variety of different viewpoints
on The Good, the Bad and the Ugly in personal preferences.
There are several other essays by well-known contributors which include
Ruarí OCuiv, Brian Kennedy, Valerie Mulvin and Noel Sheridan.
A comprehensive directory, An Architectural Guide to Art Spaces in
Ireland provides a fitting finale. What is missing, and inexplicably
so in such comprehensive coverage, is any real reference or exploratory
discussion of the National Gallery of Ireland and its Millennium Wing. Nevertheless
this book must be recommended as an invaluable commentary on art and its
public presentation in a post-modern society.
Arthur Gibney is an architectural historian and architect.
Portavo An Irish Townland and its People.
Part Two: the Famine to the Present
Peter Carr
White Row Press, Belfast, 2005
pp 393 ills 280 col 140 h/b & p/b
€50.00/£35.00 h/b ISBN 1870132262 €30.00/£20.00 p/b
ISBN 1870132211
Ian Wilson
Just
545 acres, Portavo is a townland lying between Bangor and Donaghadee in
North Down. Of Irelands 62,000 townlands however, it has become the
most intensively chronicled thanks to the positively Herculean endeavours
of Peter Carr, whose second volume on Portavo and its inhabitants, notably
the landed Ker dynasty, concludes the saga begun in the glowingly-received
2003 book.
Away back in 1988, the author commenced research on the basis of a modest
wish by the new owner of the Kers Big House to know more.
Peter Carr tells us he is not an academic historian. So will those readers
keen on an exposition of land tenure and agricultural usage of estate management
and electoral procedures through the decades be disappointed? Not a bit
of it. The book is impeccably researched and annotated. The wider context
of County Down, Irish and occasionally European affairs is judiciously introduced
when appropriate. Weighty are some of the themes the rise and fall
of a landed family, the slump in small farming in recent decades
but very lightly is how the author wears his learning.
The second volume opens with the Kers, owners of Portavo, in their heyday.
They possess, in fact, far more than Portavo, five per cent of Co Down,
including Ballynahinch and Downpatrick, plus 6000 acres in south-east Antrim.
David Stewart Ker, lately and suitably married to Anna Blackwood of Clandeboye,
runs the estates with vigour and aptitude. The author is a sure-footed guide
to the complexities of the rumbustious 1852 elections, the high point of
the Ker fortunes, when David won one of the two Co Down seats. For the young
Adonis, however, circumstances and personality combined to initiate a decline
that reduced him to virtual ruin and derangement in less than twenty years.
The fall into bankruptcy becomes even more giddy in the era of Davids
son Richard, an impossible spendthrift, devoid of any sense whatsoever,
who would avoid paying tradesmen in cash by suggesting they chose a painting
off the walls! Peter Carr combines a clear understanding of the strains
on an Irish landlords finances with a gripping, at times comical,
account of the helter-skelter descent of Richards situation.
His sons at the unaffordable Eton, David arrived to take them away, but
was unsure how many he had there. We meet, in turn, the Portavo miller Hugh
Nelson, who might be more easily forgiven this slip; he had twenty-five
children. The author introduces a cast of vividly-drawn characters from
all classes that is a major, probably the major, strength of the book. We
meet the outrageous femme fatale Caroline Persse, of the Co Galway Persse
family, who, astoundingly, marries the aging David before commencing an
affair with one of her new stepsons, Charley. And we hear of the wonder
of the last of the Copeland islanders from off the Portavo shore, on exploring
his new terraced house in Donaghadee: Look, Lisa, theres a wee
well! It was a flush toilet.
The only minor drawbacks are the lack of a Ker family tree I found
this infuriating and that, among copious illustrations, the quality
of some attributed to the Ker collection is low. Perhaps the canny tradesmen
took all the good ones off Richards walls. Peter Carr soon becomes
like an engaging companion in this unusual odyssey. As with all companions
on a journey, the reader needs human tolerance of idiosyncrasies
the occasional quirkiness of his prose style but no one will desert
Peter Carr. This is a marvellous book, richly combining attention to historical
detail with a novelists eye for character.
Ian Wilson is curator of North Down Heritage Centre and a writer on local
subjects. |